THIS IS WHAT A PRIVILEGE DENYING PATRIARCH SOUNDS LIKE
The European Declaration of Independence by Anders Behring Breivik
1518 pages of xenophobia, racism, sexist-chauvinism, anti-feminist/MRA rhetoric, cultic ideas, anti-multiculturialism, ClimateGate anti-eco-marxist conspiracy theory featuring images of the modern Knights Templar Crusader himself. He identifies as a Christian, a conservative, an European patriot who wanted to create his own political party that would ban together to create a nation against immigration, against “Islamisation” and “feminisation” and gives advice on how to purchase and handle illegal firearms. He shares plans for how the fallen warriors for his cause will get a tombstone and grave that fits his own design. He discusses the rapid extinction of Nordic genotypes/Anglo-Europeans, he suggest creating a World Bank of Genotypes to prevent “conflict and war.” (pg. 1183)
In his perfect world, all schools are gender segregated. He encourages “non-coercive biological improvement,”/eugenics and global population control. At one point he refers to Muslims as being similar to the agents in the Matrix. He also wants to compose a new “Future European Federation Anthem.” He proposes 100 solutions for South Africa, Israel and the U.S (pg. 1200). He even went as far as to create a map of how he envisions the world if his political party is successfully able to re-shape Europe and the Middle East, even naming a place “Monte Negro.” (pg. 1306)
He also murdered 77 people in Norway.
Here are just some of his insightful ideas:
"Ladies should be wives and homemakers, not cops or soldiers, and men should still hold doors open for ladies. Children should not be born out of wedlock. Glorification of homosexuality should be shunned. Jurors should not accept Islam as an excuse for murder." (pg. 4)
"In the big scheme of things, the truth is that European men have treated women with greater respect than the men of almost any other major civilisation on earth. And I don’t mean just in the modern age, I mean for many centuries. Yet we are the one group of men who are most demonised and attacked, whereas non-white men get treated with much greater respect. What white men see from this is that white Western women prefer men who treat them like crap, and disrespect men who treat them with respect. This isn’t exactly a smart way to behave if you want to be treated with dignity. The truth is that any nation is always protected from external aggression by the men. The women can play a supporting role in this, but never more than that. For all the talk about “girl power” and “women kicking ass” which you see on movies these days, if the men of your “tribe” are too weak or demoralised to protect you, you will be enslaved and crushed by the men from other “tribes” before you can say “Vagina Monologues”. Which means that if you break down men’s masculinity, their willingness and ability to defend themselves and their families, you destroy the country. That’s exactly what Western women have done for the last forty years. So why are you surprised about the results?
As you said, you can’t fool Mother Nature. Well, you have tried to fool her for a long time, and you are now paying the price for this.” (pg.333)
"Didn’t feminists always claim that the world would be a better place with women in the driver’s seat, because they wouldn’t sacrifice their own children? Well, isn’t that exactly what they are doing now? Smiling and voting for parties that keep the doors open to Muslim immigration, the same Muslims who will be attacking their children tomorrow?" (pg. 335)
"If all oppression comes from Western men, it becomes logical to try weakening them as much as possible. If you do, a paradise of peace and equality awaits us at the other side of the rainbow. Well, congratulations to Western European women. You’ve succeeded in harassing and ridiculing your own sons into suppressing many of their masculine instincts. To your surprise, you didn’t enter a feminist Nirvana, but paved the way for an unfolding Islamic hell.
It is correct, as feminists claim, that a hyper-feminine society is not as destructive as a hyper-masculine society. The catch with a too soft society is that it is unsustainable. It will get squashed as soon as it is confronted by more traditional, aggressive ones.
Instead of “having it all,” Western women risk losing everything. What are liberal feminists going to do when faced with aggressive gangs of Muslim youngsters? Burn their bras and throw the pocket edition of the Vagina Monologues at them?” (pg. 337)
”..it must be said that radical feminism has been one of the most important causes of the current weakness of Western civilisation, both culturally and demographically. Feminists, often with a Marxist world view, have been a crucial component in establishing the suffocating public censorship of Political Correctness in Western nations. They have also severely weakened the Western family structure, and contributed to making the West too soft and self-loathing to deal with aggression from Muslims.” (pg. 341)
"Feminism has hurt us by encouraging public acceptance for intellectual hypocrisy, which later paved the way for Islamic infiltration. The official mantra is that men and women are not just equal but identical, but at the same time that women are also somehow superior. Both of these claims cannot, logically speaking, be true at the same time, yet both are being made simultaneously. This gross double standard closely mirrors that of multiculturalism, where all cultures are equal but Western culture is inferior and evil." (pg. 343)
[He also quotes female anti-feminist Christina Hoff Sommers (pg. 339), an author and MRA whose book has been recommended reading for me from numerous MRAs I’ve interacted with.The fact that she is positively referred to by a mass murderer didn’t seem to bother them much].
"The essence is that the US but especially W. Europe lost the cold war due to the fact that we didn’t persecute the Marxists after WW2. If we had executed each and every Marxist and banned Marxist doctrines (not only the economical aspects but the cultural as well – internationalism, extreme feminism, extreme egalitarianism, anti-elitism, anti-nationalism) we would not be in the current situation." (pg. 723)
"…multicultural society are dominated by feminists. And across the Atlantic, if only American women voted, the US President during 9/11 would be called Al Gore, not George Bush. The standard explanation in my country for this gender gap in voting patterns is that men are more “xenophobic and selfish” than women, who are more open-minded and possess a greater ability to show solidarity with outsiders. That’s one possibility. Another one is that men traditionally have had the responsibility for protecting the “tribe” and spotting an enemy, a necessity in a dog-eat-dog world. Women are more naive, and less willing to rationally think through the long-term consequences of avoiding confrontation or dealing with unpleasant realities now." (pg. 335)